Security Guides

NEAR AI Breached Through an Inference Engine Flaw (Account Details of About 100 Users): What Was Confirmed and What Users and AI Infrastructure Operators Should Do

NEAR AI says a flaw in its SGLang inference engine let an attacker take details of about 100 users and data of 18 agents. What is confirmed and what to do.

Published 2026-11-11 Updated 2026-11-11 Last verified 2026-11-11 12 min read
On this page

For: people who used NEAR AI's chat (Private Chat), NEAR AI Cloud or agents, and operators who run AI inference servers or agent platforms of their own. This article is based on NEAR AI's official blog post and does not cover attack steps.

Developing: this article will be updated as the organisation publishes more

Who is affected

people who used NEAR AI's chat (Private Chat), NEAR AI Cloud or agents, and operators who run AI inference servers or agent platforms of their own.

Confirmed so farSee the table ↓
  • Entry point
  • Account details (email, name)
  • Plan and balance information
2 more
  • Legacy agents
  • NEAR AI Cloud API keys

Listed as possibly affected

  • Requests being processed (including confidential mode)
Not yet confirmed
  • When the intrusion was detected and when the attacker first got in (not stated in the report)
  • Whether confidential-mode requests were actually observed (the company says they could have been)
  • Whether and which regulatory notifications are required (the company says it will make the required ones)
2 more
  • The exact number of affected users (the company says approximately 100)
  • An identifier for the SGLang flaw (not stated in the report)
What to do nowSee the steps ↓
  1. Check whether the company contacted you
  2. Be wary of messages about your account or balance
  3. If you wrote secrets into agents or chats, rotate them (our view)
2 more
  1. If you use NEAR AI Cloud API keys, review how you handle them
  2. AI infrastructure operators: review your own setup
Last checked
As of November 11, 2026
Follow-up plans and what we checked

The company's report is dated November 9, 2026 and describes what the investigation "to date" has confirmed. It gives no schedule for further updates. When we checked on November 11, 2026, we found no update to the report.

What users and AI infrastructure operators should do today

1

Check whether the company contacted you

According to the company's report, users whose account details it confirmed were accessed, and the owners of the 18 agents, were contacted directly from security@near.ai with the steps that apply to them. Check your spam folder too. If you received a message, follow its guidance first.

If you are unsure whether a message is genuine, do not open its links; open the company's official site yourself. The company's contact is security@near.ai.

2

Be wary of messages about your account or balance

The company advises treating unsolicited messages that reference your account or balance with caution. What was taken is an email address and name, plus plan and balance information for some accounts. Together these allow convincing fake messages to be written (a general point). Do not open links; check your account through a bookmark. More in What phishing is.

3

If you wrote secrets into agents or chats, rotate them (our view)

What the company confirmed is that chat history, settings and logs of 18 legacy agents were retrieved, and, separately, that API keys of two Cloud customers were exposed in logs (not stated to have been taken). It also says user requests on the compromised server on November 8 could have been observed.

If you ever put an API key, password or connection string into an agent's settings or a chat, rotate it with the issuer as a precaution. You do not need to wait to learn whether it was seen. For key handling, see Environment variables and API keys basics.

4

If you use NEAR AI Cloud API keys, review how you handle them

The company says the keys exposed in logs belonged to two Cloud customers and have been revoked. The report gives no guidance for other customers' keys. Review where you use your keys, delete the ones you no longer use, and check that you have not written them into logs or history (our view).

5

AI infrastructure operators: review your own setup

What to check in your own inference and agent infrastructure in light of this incident is summarised below under "What operators of AI infrastructure should review".

What happened (from NEAR AI's announcement)

This section is based on NEAR AI's official blog post "Security Incident Report" (November 9, 2026). It is the company's own account and has not been verified by a third party. The report gives no times of day.

  1. Date not stated

    The attacker exploits a remote code execution flaw in SGLang to run code on one inference server and reaches the company's infrastructure from there. The company does not say when it noticed the intrusion.
  2. Within what the investigation confirmed

    The attacker reaches an internal system behind the previously deprecated Private Chat and downloads account details of about 100 users. It also accesses 18 legacy agents.
  3. November 8

    The attacker could have observed user requests being processed on the compromised server, including confidential-mode requests (the company).
  4. After detection

    The company revokes all active sessions and administrative credentials, replaces all agent tokens, takes Private Chat offline and deploys a fix across all inference servers. It also completes rotation of all remaining credentials and a full forensic review.
  5. November 9

    The company publishes its report. The access has been closed and access to NEAR AI Cloud restored. Affected users have been contacted directly.

One inference server

Code run via an SGLang flaw

↓

Other infrastructure

Internal system, legacy agents

↓

November 9

Fixed, rotated, disclosed

Flow based on NEAR AI's official blog (the company's account).
About 100
Users whose account details were taken (the company): email, name, and for some plan and balance
18
Legacy agents accessed; they were not running in the confidential computing (TEE) environment (the company)
2 Cloud customers
NEAR AI Cloud customers whose API keys were exposed in logs; keys revoked (the company)
No sign
Of access to stored Private Chat conversations or uploaded files (the company)
Key points of the announcement (NEAR AI blog)
Entry point
A remote code execution flaw in SGLang, the open-source inference engine running on the company's servers. Code ran on one inference server and the attacker reached other infrastructure from there
Taken (1)
From an internal system behind the previously deprecated Private Chat: email addresses and names of about 100 users, and for some accounts plan and balance information
Taken (2)
Chat history, settings and logs of 18 agents on a legacy deployment of NEAR AI Agents that were not running in the confidential computing environment
Exposed in logs (revoked)
NEAR AI Cloud API keys of two Cloud customers were exposed in logs (not stated to have been taken). The keys have been revoked
Could have been seen
On November 8, user requests being processed on the compromised server, including requests running in confidential mode
No indication of
Access to stored Private Chat conversations or uploaded files
The company's response
Revoked sessions and administrative credentials, replaced agent tokens, took Private Chat offline, deployed the fix across all inference servers, rotated credentials, completed a full forensic review, notified affected users and reported the flaw to the SGLang project. It says it will make any regulatory notifications that are required

What is known and what is not

The state as of November 11, 2026. We will update the status column when more is published.

ItemContentStatus
Entry pointA remote code execution flaw in SGLangConfirmed (the company)
Account details (email, name)About 100 users' details takenConfirmed (the company)
Plan and balance informationTaken for some accountsConfirmed (the company)
Legacy agents18 accessed; chat history, settings and logs retrievedConfirmed (the company)
NEAR AI Cloud API keysTwo Cloud customers' keys exposed in logs; revoked (not stated to have been taken)Confirmed (the company)
Requests being processed (including confidential mode)Could have been observed on November 8 on the compromised serverPossible (the company)
Stored Private Chat conversationsNo indication of accessNot confirmed (the company)
Uploaded filesNo indication of accessNot confirmed (the company)
PasswordsNot in the list of what was takenNot stated
Payment card numbersNot in the list of what was takenNot stated
When the intrusion was noticedNot statedNot stated
Identifier (CVE) of the SGLang flawNot statedNot stated
Regulatory notificationsThe company says it will make the required onesThe company says it will make the required notifications

How to read this: the company's account has not been verified by a third party

The figures of about 100 users, 18 agents and two Cloud customers are what the company's own investigation has confirmed "to date". The company says it completed a full forensic review, but the report does not say whether an outside firm was involved or what it found. "Passwords" and "payment card numbers" are simply absent from the list of what was taken; the company did not say they were excluded.

What can happen when an inference server has a flaw

The following is general and does not mean these things happened here. What the company has published as having happened is limited to "What happened" above.

An inference server receives users' input (prompts), runs it through a model and returns the answer. If arbitrary code can run on it, it can reach the input and output that server is processing. If the server also holds permissions or connections to other internal systems, those become the next entrance.

The company explains that confidential computing protects against the operator and the host, not against a vulnerability in the software running inside the environment. The protection of input therefore depends on more than the outer boundary: on updating the software that runs inside it and on the permissions of the services around it.

What operators of AI infrastructure should review

This section does not evaluate the company's response, and it does not guess the technical content of the flaw. From the published account, it is limited to points to check in your own setup, and they are our view.

1

Minimize what an inference server can reach

In this account, code execution on one inference server led to other infrastructure. Giving an inference server no credentials or connections to internal management systems and other servers, and limiting its traffic to the destinations it needs, can shrink how far one compromised machine spreads (our view).

2

Do not leave the internal systems of retired services behind

The account details that were taken sat in an internal system behind the previously deprecated Private Chat. For a service you stop using, do more than switch it off: delete the data, revoke the credentials and remove it from the network. Whatever you keep is what is exposed when a breach happens (our view).

3

Move legacy environments to the stronger side of your isolation

The 18 agents were on a legacy deployment that was not running in the confidential computing environment. Strengthening a new environment leaves the legacy one as the weak side. Migrate it or set a deadline to retire it, and apply the same permission limits in the meantime (our view).

4

Keep secrets out of logs

The company says API keys of two Cloud customers were exposed in logs. Do not write request headers or settings to logs as they are, mask keys and tokens, and limit access to where logs are stored. Prepare in advance the steps to revoke a key quickly if one does end up in a log (our view). Another case where key handling was the focus is The Northflank security incident.

5

Have a path to roll out inference-engine updates to every server quickly

The company deployed the fix across all inference servers and reported the flaw to the SGLang project. If you use an open-source inference engine, keeping a deployment path that can push a published fix to every server fast, and an inventory of the versions you run, shortens the time from noticing to fixing (our view). Another intrusion into AI infrastructure is covered in The intrusion into Hugging Face.

Sources (public records)

The facts in this article come from the public information below. Attack step details are not covered.

  • NEAR AI, "Security Incident Report" (official blog, November 9, 2026; checked November 11) — near.ai

Update history

2026-11-11: First version. Based on NEAR AI's official blog post (November 9, 2026). We will update when more is published.

Latest breaking reports

All breaking reports →

FAQ

QWhat happened at NEAR AI?
A

According to NEAR AI's official blog post (November 9, 2026), an attacker exploited a remote code execution flaw in SGLang, the open-source inference engine running on its servers. That gave the attacker code execution on one inference server, and from there access to other infrastructure. The company says it closed the access, replaced affected credentials, fixed the vulnerability and restored access to NEAR AI Cloud.

QAm I affected?
A

According to the company, users whose account details it confirmed were accessed, and the owners of the 18 agents, were contacted directly from security@near.ai with the steps that apply to them. If you received nothing, you were not among the people the company confirmed as affected, but the report does not give guidance for people who were not affected.

QWhat information was taken?
A

The company confirmed two things were taken. (1) From an internal system behind the previously deprecated Private Chat: email addresses and names of about 100 users, and for some accounts plan and balance information. (2) Chat history, settings and logs of 18 legacy agents that were not running in its confidential computing (TEE) environment. Separately, (3) NEAR AI Cloud API keys of two Cloud customers were exposed in logs and are now revoked (the report does not say they were taken). The company found no indication that stored Private Chat conversations or uploaded files were accessed.

QWere requests sent in confidential mode seen?
A

The company writes that on November 8 the attacker could have observed user requests being processed on the compromised server, including requests running in confidential mode. It does not say they were observed. Its explanation is that confidential computing does not protect against a vulnerability in the software running inside the environment.

QWhat is the CVE number of the flaw?
A

The company's report gives no CVE number. It says only that the flaw is a remote code execution vulnerability in SGLang and that it reported it to the SGLang project. This site does not attach an identifier the report does not state.

QWhat should I watch for now that account details were taken?
A

The company advises treating unsolicited messages that reference your account or balance with caution. An email address and name plus plan or balance information can be used to write a convincing fake message. Do not open links in such messages; check your account through a bookmark to the official site.